This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: To which of these phenomena are X-ray busters most similar? A) novae B) planetary nebulae C) ... (Read 22 times)

Zoey63294

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 539
To which of these phenomena are X-ray busters most similar?
 
  A) novae
  B) planetary nebulae
  C) type I supernovae
  D) type II supernovae
  E) hypernovae

Question 2

What is the primary source of erosion on the Moon? Why does change take so long there?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

mammy1697

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

A constant fall of meteoroids from space pelts the Moon, pulverizing the surface with tiny craters. But really big impacts are rare, and these microscopic changes take a long time to show up as seen from Earth. Our erosive agents like wind, water, and ice can make much more dramatic changes in short periods of time, such as floods, sandstorms, glaciers, etc.




Zoey63294

  • Member
  • Posts: 539
Reply 2 on: Jul 27, 2018
Excellent


nanny

  • Member
  • Posts: 313
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

Approximately 15–25% of recognized pregnancies end in miscarriage. However, many miscarriages often occur before a woman even knows she is pregnant.

Did you know?

Amoebae are the simplest type of protozoans, and are characterized by a feeding and dividing trophozoite stage that moves by temporary extensions called pseudopodia or false feet.

Did you know?

Not getting enough sleep can greatly weaken the immune system. Lack of sleep makes you more likely to catch a cold, or more difficult to fight off an infection.

Did you know?

Limit intake of red meat and dairy products made with whole milk. Choose skim milk, low-fat or fat-free dairy products. Limit fried food. Use healthy oils when cooking.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library