This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: What is the significance of a double dissociation? Describe the double dissociation found by ... (Read 25 times)

oliviahorn72

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
What is the significance of a double dissociation? Describe the double dissociation found by Rubenstein et al. (2001). What does this double dissociation mean for the information- processing model of task switching?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Explain the need for an attentional controller and a conflict monitor in the neural-network model of cognitive processing for the Stroop task.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Anna

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Answer to Question 1

Answer: A double dissociation exists when one variable affects one level of processing but not another and another variable shows the opposite pattern. A double dissociation is significant because it provides evidence for two different mechanisms. Rubenstein et al. (2001) conducted a task-switching experiment using addition and subtraction. However, they included the operator (+ or -) to eliminate the need to remember which operation to perform on a given trial. This minimized switching costs by improving performance in the alternating blocks. The presence of the operator did not impact performance in the pure blocks. Therefore, the operator influenced executive processing but not task processing. Rubenstein et al. (2001) also presented a task- switching task while making the numbers difficult to discriminate. Although poor discriminabilty of the numbers increased response time (task processing), it did not impact switching costs (executive processing). This double dissociation is important for the information processing model of task switching because it supports the idea that two mechanisms, executive processing and task processing, are involved in task-switching tasks.

Answer to Question 2

Answer: The three-layer neural-network model of cognitive processing for the Stroop task suggests that word nodes have stronger connections to the response nodes than the color nodes. As a result, many errors should be made when the words are incompatible. However, participants do not make that many errors on incompatible trials. Therefore, it is important to include an attentional controller in the model to add activation to the nodes that are relevant to the goals of the task at hand. The conflict monitor monitors for conflict between nodes. When conflict increases, the conflict monitor engages executive attention.




oliviahorn72

  • Member
  • Posts: 579
Reply 2 on: Jun 20, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


vickyvicksss

  • Member
  • Posts: 351
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

The effects of organophosphate poisoning are referred to by using the abbreviations “SLUD” or “SLUDGE,” It stands for: salivation, lacrimation, urination, defecation, GI upset, and emesis.

Did you know?

Less than one of every three adults with high LDL cholesterol has the condition under control. Only 48.1% with the condition are being treated for it.

Did you know?

Congestive heart failure is a serious disorder that carries a reduced life expectancy. Heart failure is usually a chronic illness, and it may worsen with infection or other physical stressors.

Did you know?

Women are 50% to 75% more likely than men to experience an adverse drug reaction.

Did you know?

It is believed that the Incas used anesthesia. Evidence supports the theory that shamans chewed cocoa leaves and drilled holes into the heads of patients (letting evil spirits escape), spitting into the wounds they made. The mixture of cocaine, saliva, and resin numbed the site enough to allow hours of drilling.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library