This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: I take two pictures of my dog Kaycee. I use the same film and level of illumination for both ... (Read 82 times)

Ebrown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 567
I take two pictures of my dog Kaycee. I use the same film and level of illumination for both pictures, but I halve the f-number for the second picture. By what factor will the required time of exposure change if the film is to receive the same total light energy?
 a. 4.0
  c. 2.0
  b. 0.50
  d. 0.25

Question 2

Doubling the f-number of a camera lens will change the light intensity admitted to the film by what factor?
 a. 1/4
  c. 1/2
  b. 4
  d. 2



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

jjorrostieta

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

A




Ebrown

  • Member
  • Posts: 567
Reply 2 on: Jul 28, 2018
:D TYSM


ghepp

  • Member
  • Posts: 361
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

It is believed that humans initially contracted crabs from gorillas about 3 million years ago from either sleeping in gorilla nests or eating the apes.

Did you know?

Cyanide works by making the human body unable to use oxygen.

Did you know?

About 80% of major fungal systemic infections are due to Candida albicans. Another form, Candida peritonitis, occurs most often in postoperative patients. A rare disease, Candida meningitis, may follow leukemia, kidney transplant, other immunosuppressed factors, or when suffering from Candida septicemia.

Did you know?

There are over 65,000 known species of protozoa. About 10,000 species are parasitic.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library