This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Steam burns are much more damaging than boiling-water burns because steam A) has a higher ... (Read 52 times)

fbq8i

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Steam burns are much more damaging than boiling-water burns because steam
 
  A) has a higher temperature.
  B) releases more thermal energy.
  C) is hotter.
  D) is gaseous.

Question 2

Boiling water burns are less damaging than steam burns because boiling water
 
  A) doesn't condense and release additional energy.
  B) has less energy per kilogram than steam.
  C) both of these
  D) none of the above



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

memslove

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
Answer to Question 1

Answer: B

Answer to Question 2

Answer: C




fbq8i

  • Member
  • Posts: 527
Reply 2 on: Jul 29, 2018
:D TYSM


deja

  • Member
  • Posts: 332
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

Never take aspirin without food because it is likely to irritate your stomach. Never give aspirin to children under age 12. Overdoses of aspirin have the potential to cause deafness.

Did you know?

There are more sensory neurons in the tongue than in any other part of the body.

Did you know?

Women are two-thirds more likely than men to develop irritable bowel syndrome. This may be attributable to hormonal changes related to their menstrual cycles.

Did you know?

For about 100 years, scientists thought that peptic ulcers were caused by stress, spicy food, and alcohol. Later, researchers added stomach acid to the list of causes and began treating ulcers with antacids. Now it is known that peptic ulcers are predominantly caused by Helicobacter pylori, a spiral-shaped bacterium that normally exist in the stomach.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library