This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The equivalent resistance of any series of resistors in a circuit is A) often less than the ... (Read 268 times)

wrbasek0

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 560
The equivalent resistance of any series of resistors in a circuit is
 
  A) often less than the resistance of the lowest resistor.
  B) always less than the resistance of the lowest resistor.
  C) usually half the value of the lowest resistor.
  D) none of the above

Question 2

When a pair of 1-ohm resistors are connected in series, their equivalent (combined) resistance is 2 ohms, and when connected in parallel is
 
  A)  ohm.
  B) none of the above
  C) also 2 ohms.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

BAOCHAU2803

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

Answer: D

Answer to Question 2

Answer: A





 

Did you know?

The oldest recorded age was 122. Madame Jeanne Calment was born in France in 1875 and died in 1997. She was a vegetarian and loved olive oil, port wine, and chocolate.

Did you know?

Prostaglandins were first isolated from human semen in Sweden in the 1930s. They were so named because the researcher thought that they came from the prostate gland. In fact, prostaglandins exist and are synthesized in almost every cell of the body.

Did you know?

Immunoglobulin injections may give short-term protection against, or reduce severity of certain diseases. They help people who have an inherited problem making their own antibodies, or those who are having certain types of cancer treatments.

Did you know?

The cure for trichomoniasis is easy as long as the patient does not drink alcoholic beverages for 24 hours. Just a single dose of medication is needed to rid the body of the disease. However, without proper precautions, an individual may contract the disease repeatedly. In fact, most people develop trichomoniasis again within three months of their last treatment.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library