Two expert raters are trained to rate the ability of graduate ...

[magmichele12]

Two expert raters are trained to rate the ability of graduate students to use different kinds of questions when gathering information. After three weeks of training, their interrater reliability is .60. These raters:
 
  a. have achieved high interrater reliability.
  b. have a way to go before they are proficient at rating.
  c. need to make the definitions of the use of questions a little more vague so their ratings will improve. d. None of these are true.

Question 2

Which of the following is NOT true about portfolio assessments?
 
  a. They may include comments from teachers or supervisors.
  b. They are considered a paper project.
  c. Validity can be improved by linking items to competencies or standards.
  d. They should be graded with a rubric or similar scoring system.

[lin77x]

Answer to Question 1

ANSWER: b

Answer to Question 2

ANSWER: b

[magmichele12]

Thank you!

[lin77x]

Always glad to help...