Author Question: Meta-analysis of the short- and long-term effects of CBT for pathological gambling compared to no ... (Read 82 times)

dollx

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 558
Meta-analysis of the short- and long-term effects of CBT for pathological gambling compared to no treatment has found:
 
  a. large short-term but very small long-term effect sizes.
  b. medium short- and long-term effect sizes.
  c. very large effect sizes at both short- and long-term follow-ups.
  d. small short-term effect sizes that increase to moderate over time.

Question 2

Controlled studies of CBT for chronic fatigue syndrome have demonstrated generally:
 
  a. relatively weak outcomes likely due to the debilitating nature of the disorder.
  b. moderate effect sizes at the end of treatment.
  c. very high drop-out rates (> 50).
  d. reduced efficacy when clients have comorbid anxiety or depression.



gstein359

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 293
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

B



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

dollx

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 558
Both answers were spot on, thank you once again




 

Did you know?

Acetaminophen (Tylenol) in overdose can seriously damage the liver. It should never be taken by people who use alcohol heavily; it can result in severe liver damage and even a condition requiring a liver transplant.

Did you know?

Cocaine was isolated in 1860 and first used as a local anesthetic in 1884. Its first clinical use was by Sigmund Freud to wean a patient from morphine addiction. The fictional character Sherlock Holmes was supposed to be addicted to cocaine by injection.

Did you know?

There are approximately 3 million unintended pregnancies in the United States each year.

Did you know?

Stroke kills people from all ethnic backgrounds, but the people at highest risk for fatal strokes are: black men, black women, Asian men, white men, and white women.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library