Author Question: When might using rounds be more advantageous than using dyads? What will be an ideal ... (Read 140 times)

NguyenJ · **on:** Jul 30, 2018

When might using rounds be more advantageous than using dyads?

What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Which statement is most true about the directive nature of the Adlerian approach?

a. The counselor cannot be both egalitarian and directive.
b. The directive nature of the approach requires counselors to make the client see her or her basic mistakes.
c. Directiveness is an encouraging, non-hierarchical style which uses the form of education.
d. The counselor should be more directive than egalitarian as it best represents the counselor role as educator.

apple · **Reply #1 on:** Jul 30, 2018

Answer to Question 1

Using rounds might be more advantageous than using dyads when the leader wants to hear briefly from everyone, to check in with everyone, or to locate energy quickly in the group. These are easier to do in a round because the leader would not have to physically move around the room to gather such information, and only one person talks at a time in a round (versus multiple people in different dyads talking at once), so it would be easier for the leader to hear.

Answer to Question 2

C