Author Question: An achievement test is not designed to a. measure an individual's result gained by effort b. ... (Read 67 times)

SO00

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
An achievement test is not designed to
 
  a. measure an individual's result gained by effort
  b. determine how much an individual has learned from instruction
  c. estimate an individual's performance at some time in the future
  d. identify an individual's acquired level of knowledge or skill

Question 2

An aptitude test is not designed to
 
  a. gage an individual's capacity for learning
  b. measure a person's present performance on selected tasks
  c. determine how knowledgeable a person is in different academic areas
  d. provide information to estimate how a person will perform at some time in the future or in a different situation



mammy1697

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

c



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

People about to have surgery must tell their health care providers about all supplements they take.

Did you know?

Many supplement containers do not even contain what their labels say. There are many documented reports of products containing much less, or more, that what is listed on their labels. They may also contain undisclosed prescription drugs and even contaminants.

Did you know?

More than 30% of American adults, and about 12% of children utilize health care approaches that were developed outside of conventional medicine.

Did you know?

People who have myopia, or nearsightedness, are not able to see objects at a distance but only up close. It occurs when the cornea is either curved too steeply, the eye is too long, or both. This condition is progressive and worsens with time. More than 100 million people in the United States are nearsighted, but only 20% of those are born with the condition. Diet, eye exercise, drug therapy, and corrective lenses can all help manage nearsightedness.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library