This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In the case Schaffer v. Weast, the court ruled that placement in a general education classroom with ... (Read 71 times)

nramada

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 580
In the case Schaffer v. Weast, the court ruled that placement in a general education classroom with supplementary aids and services must be offered to a student with disabilities prior to considering more segregated placements
 
  a. True
  b. False

Question 2

Litigation has done far more to shape state and federal special education policy than legislation has done
 
  a. True
  b. False



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

briseldagonzales

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
Answer to Question 1

False

Answer to Question 2

False




nramada

  • Member
  • Posts: 580
Reply 2 on: Jul 31, 2018
Gracias!


jordangronback

  • Member
  • Posts: 339
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

Asthma cases in Americans are about 75% higher today than they were in 1980.

Did you know?

In 1885, the Lloyd Manufacturing Company of Albany, New York, promoted and sold "Cocaine Toothache Drops" at 15 cents per bottle! In 1914, the Harrison Narcotic Act brought the sale and distribution of this drug under federal control.

Did you know?

Medications that are definitely not safe to take when breastfeeding include radioactive drugs, antimetabolites, some cancer (chemotherapy) agents, bromocriptine, ergotamine, methotrexate, and cyclosporine.

Did you know?

A serious new warning has been established for pregnant women against taking ACE inhibitors during pregnancy. In the study, the risk of major birth defects in children whose mothers took ACE inhibitors during the first trimester was nearly three times higher than in children whose mothers didn't take ACE inhibitors. Physicians can prescribe alternative medications for pregnant women who have symptoms of high blood pressure.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library