This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In comparison to between-subjects designs, within-subjects designs . a. require fewer ... (Read 154 times)

PhilipSeeMore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 561
In comparison to between-subjects designs, within-subjects designs .
 
  a. require fewer participants
  b. may be more sensitive to the effects of the independent variable
  c. are more susceptible to multiple treatment effects
  d. all the above

Question 2

Eta squared provides a measure of .
 
  a. error variation
  b. the value of the difference between population means
  c. the minimum sample size required to achieve a specific level of power
  d. the strength of effect of an independent variable



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

olivia_paige29

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

D




PhilipSeeMore

  • Member
  • Posts: 561
Reply 2 on: Aug 2, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


apple

  • Member
  • Posts: 352
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

Eating carrots will improve your eyesight. Carrots are high in vitamin A (retinol), which is essential for good vision. It can also be found in milk, cheese, egg yolks, and liver.

Did you know?

The tallest man ever known was Robert Wadlow, an American, who reached the height of 8 feet 11 inches. He died at age 26 years from an infection caused by the immense weight of his body (491 pounds) and the stress on his leg bones and muscles.

Did you know?

Though methadone is often used to treat dependency on other opioids, the drug itself can be abused. Crushing or snorting methadone can achieve the opiate "rush" desired by addicts. Improper use such as these can lead to a dangerous dependency on methadone. This drug now accounts for nearly one-third of opioid-related deaths.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

Did you know?

The human body's pharmacokinetics are quite varied. Our hair holds onto drugs longer than our urine, blood, or saliva. For example, alcohol can be detected in the hair for up to 90 days after it was consumed. The same is true for marijuana, cocaine, ecstasy, heroin, methamphetamine, and nicotine.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library