This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The recognition of the possibility of an action in negligence by the court in the famous MacPherson ... (Read 35 times)

erika

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 522
The recognition of the possibility of an action in negligence by the court in the famous MacPherson
  case meant that the plaintiff had an opportunity to recover damages, an opportunity that had been
  foreclosed under the old rule of
 
  A) privity of contract B) caveat emptor
  C) the warranty of merchantability D) the warranty of fitness

Question 2

The underlying rationale for recovery under a warranty is
 
  A) breach of duty of care B) caveat emptor
  C) breach of promise D) nulle pene sine lege



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

sarahccccc

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

C



erika

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 522
Both answers were spot on, thank you once again




 

Did you know?

Not getting enough sleep can greatly weaken the immune system. Lack of sleep makes you more likely to catch a cold, or more difficult to fight off an infection.

Did you know?

Adolescents often feel clumsy during puberty because during this time of development, their hands and feet grow faster than their arms and legs do. The body is therefore out of proportion. One out of five adolescents actually experiences growing pains during this period.

Did you know?

About 3.2 billion people, nearly half the world population, are at risk for malaria. In 2015, there are about 214 million malaria cases and an estimated 438,000 malaria deaths.

Did you know?

The calories found in one piece of cherry cheesecake could light a 60-watt light bulb for 1.5 hours.

Did you know?

When Gabriel Fahrenheit invented the first mercury thermometer, he called "zero degrees" the lowest temperature he was able to attain with a mixture of ice and salt. For the upper point of his scale, he used 96°, which he measured as normal human body temperature (we know it to be 98.6° today because of more accurate thermometers).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library