Author Question: Explain why the federal judicial conference has adopted canons of ethics regulating judges. What ... (Read 60 times)

bobthebuilder · **on:** Aug 3, 2018

Explain why the federal judicial conference has adopted canons of ethics regulating judges.

What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Explain when the U.S. Supreme Court has original jurisdiction.

What will be an ideal response?

memslove · **Reply #1 on:** Aug 3, 2018

Answer to Question 1

The canons of ethics adopted by the federal judicial conference exemplify the type of rules regulating judges throughout the United States. The purpose of regulation is to make sure that judges are not engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the effective operation of the courts or that the judge is not suffering from a physical or mental disability that prevents him or her from carrying out judicial duties.

Answer to Question 2

Although the Supreme Court, like the appellate courts, is primarily a court of appellate jurisdiction, original jurisdiction exists when cases affect ambassadors, public ministers, and consuls or when a state is a party. Original jurisdiction is set forth in Article III, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution.