Answer to Question 1
The threshold question is, did the parties live together in a common law jurisdiction or satisfy the requirements at some point in another jurisdiction? Assuming they did, the response should identify the basic requirements for a common law marriage and indicate how they are satisfied by the facts of this case.
a) The parties must have the legal capacity to marry: The parties appear to have capacity (they are of the opposite sex, of legal age, not previously married, etc.)
b) The parties must simultaneously intend to be married: They made a personal commitment while on vacation.
c) The parties must cohabit: They lived together. Although they did not have children, neither consummation nor parenthood is a requirement for a valid common law marriage.
d) They must hold themselves out to the public as married: They presented themselves to others as married. The kinds of information paralegals might gather to prove the existence of a common law marriage are identified in Paralegal Application 3.4 on page 85 of the text.
Answer to Question 2
The definition of family now includes several kinds of relationships including, among others, same-sex marriage, civil unions, domestic partnerships, adult adoption, and functional family status. The reasons why the definition has evolved might include the following, among others:
a) That today fewer people choose to marry
b) That there is a decreased emphasis on marriage as a religious sacrament
c) That marriage has become less gendered in terms of marital roles, etc.
d) That marriages are no longer viewed as permanent by most
e) That same-sex marriages are permitted in a limited number of states
f) That husbands no longer control their wives or are entitled to their wives' earnings
g) Marriage and procreation are less and less intertwined.
Finally, the response calls for a personal definition of marriage.