Author Question: A prosecutor writes a memorandum expressing concerns about a search warrant issued by a judge. The ... (Read 288 times)

schs14

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
A prosecutor writes a memorandum expressing concerns about a search warrant issued by a judge. The prosecutor is terminated for cause. Discuss whether the government abridged the prosecutor's free speech rights.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Discuss the public duty doctrine with regard to definition, theory, and application. Using logical arguments, explain why you agree or disagree with the public duty doctrine.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



jrpg123456

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 317
Answer to Question 1

The First Amendment prohibits the government from abridging free speech. In determining whether speech by a public employee is protected, the question is whether the employee spoke as a citizen on a matter of public concern. If the answer is no, the government has broader discretion to restrict the speech, similar to a private employer. If the individual spoke as a citizen on an issue of public concern, the government can restrict speech only to the extent necessary to ensure the efficient and effective operation of the employer. In Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a district attorney's memorandum outlining his concerns with a search warrant did not constitute protected speech, and thus his termination was not an abridgement of free speech, because the memorandum was written in the course of his official job responsibilities.

Answer to Question 2

The public duty doctrine holds that governments and corresponding agencies owe duties to the public at large but not to individual citizens. In short, this doctrine holds that a duty to all translates as a duty to no one.. The doctrine is designed to keep the courts from meddling in the affairs of the legislative and executive branches of the government. Only when a special duty to the plaintiff exists will the duty to a specific individual be found and liability accrue.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Anti-aging claims should not ever be believed. There is no supplement, medication, or any other substance that has been proven to slow or stop the aging process.

Did you know?

Many supplement containers do not even contain what their labels say. There are many documented reports of products containing much less, or more, that what is listed on their labels. They may also contain undisclosed prescription drugs and even contaminants.

Did you know?

The National Institutes of Health have supported research into acupuncture. This has shown that acupuncture significantly reduced pain associated with osteoarthritis of the knee, when used as a complement to conventional therapies.

Did you know?

In 2010, opiate painkllers, such as morphine, OxyContin®, and Vicodin®, were tied to almost 60% of drug overdose deaths.

Did you know?

More than 34,000 trademarked medication names and more than 10,000 generic medication names are in use in the United States.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library