This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: If notice of a potential settlement between an underinsured motorist and a UIM carrier's insured is ... (Read 120 times)

nelaaney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 560
If notice of a potential settlement between an underinsured motorist and a UIM carrier's insured is required to be provided to a UIM carrier, this is to protect:
 
  a. The UIM insurer from bad faith.
  b. The UIM insurer's indemnity rights.
  c. The UIM insurer's subrogation rights.
  d. The UIM insurer's right to a jury trial.

Question 2

Caveat emptor means:
 
  a. Let the seller beware
  b. Let the agent beware
  c. Let the broker beware
  d. Let the buyer beware



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

macmac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

D




nelaaney

  • Member
  • Posts: 560
Reply 2 on: Aug 3, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


xthemafja

  • Member
  • Posts: 348
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

By definition, when a medication is administered intravenously, its bioavailability is 100%.

Did you know?

The average older adult in the United States takes five prescription drugs per day. Half of these drugs contain a sedative. Alcohol should therefore be avoided by most senior citizens because of the dangerous interactions between alcohol and sedatives.

Did you know?

Interferon was scarce and expensive until 1980, when the interferon gene was inserted into bacteria using recombinant DNA technology, allowing for mass cultivation and purification from bacterial cultures.

Did you know?

As many as 20% of Americans have been infected by the fungus known as Histoplasmosis. While most people are asymptomatic or only have slight symptoms, infection can progress to a rapid and potentially fatal superinfection.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library