Which defense would a website owner likely assert when a third ...

[jake]

Which defense would a website owner likely assert when a third party posts an online comment on the website that is allegedly tortious?
 
  a. consent
  b. section 230 of the Communications Decency Act
  c. sovereign immunity
  d. all of the above

Question 2

After signing a written contract, Trevor realizes that it did not contain a provision he thought it did. He has a letter from him to the other party stating that the provision was necessary, and that he would not sign the contract without it. Can the letter be used to add the provision to the written contract?
 
  A) Yes, if the contract is ambiguous with regard to whether that provision should have been included.
  B) Yes, as long as the written agreement was not yet signed by the other party.
  C) No.
  D) Yes, because the provision's absence from the contract was a unilateral mistake.

[gabrielle_lawrence]

Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

A

[jake]

TYSM

[lkanara2]

Gracias!