This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The main distinction between negligent infliction of emotional distress and intentional infliction ... (Read 71 times)

yoooooman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
The main distinction between negligent infliction of emotional distress and intentional infliction of emotional distress is that negligent infliction of emotional distress does not require a showing of outrageous conduct.
 
  a. True
   b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

All 50 states have recognized false light as a separate tort.
 
  a. True
   b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

aham8f

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

FALSE




yoooooman

  • Member
  • Posts: 557
Reply 2 on: Aug 3, 2018
Excellent


ebonylittles

  • Member
  • Posts: 318
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

According to the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, more than 50 million Americans have some kind of food allergy. Food allergies affect between 4 and 6% of children, and 4% of adults, according to the CDC. The most common food allergies include shellfish, peanuts, walnuts, fish, eggs, milk, and soy.

Did you know?

In the United States, congenital cytomegalovirus causes one child to become disabled almost every hour. CMV is the leading preventable viral cause of development disability in newborns. These disabilities include hearing or vision loss, and cerebral palsy.

Did you know?

The Romans did not use numerals to indicate fractions but instead used words to indicate parts of a whole.

Did you know?

The longest a person has survived after a heart transplant is 24 years.

Did you know?

The first monoclonal antibodies were made exclusively from mouse cells. Some are now fully human, which means they are likely to be safer and may be more effective than older monoclonal antibodies.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library