Author Question: Describe the parties' duty to disclose under FRCP 26 and its relationship with traditional methods ... (Read 49 times)

B

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
Describe the parties' duty to disclose under FRCP 26 and its relationship with traditional methods of discovery.
 
  Any help with this would be great.

Question 2

What is a motion for summary judgment?
 
  Help with this? Thank you.



wuly

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Answer to Question 1

Each party to a lawsuit has a duty to disclose to the other party specified types of information prior to the discovery stage of litigation. Under FRCP Rule 26(f), once a lawsuit is brought, the parties (the plaintiff and defendant and/or their attorneys, if the parties are represented by counsel) must schedule a prediscovery meeting to discuss the nature of the lawsuit, any defenses that may be raised against the claims being brought, and possibilities for promptly settling or otherwise resolving the dispute. The meeting should take place as soon as practicable but at least 14 days before a scheduling conference is held or a scheduling order issued. Either at this meeting or within 10 days after it, the parties must also make the initial disclosures described below and submit to the court a plan for discovery. As the trial date approaches, the attorneys must make subsequent disclosures relating to witnesses, documents, and other information that is relevant to the case.
These rules do not replace the traditional methods of discovery. Rather, the rules impose a duty on attorneys to disclose specified information automatically to opposing counsel early in the litigation process so that the time and costs of traditional discovery can be reduced. Attorneys may still use the traditional discovery tools (depositions and interrogatories, for instance) to obtain information, but they cannot use these methods until the prediscovery meeting has been held and initial disclosures have been made. Also, to save the court's time, the rules give attorneys a freer hand in crafting a discovery plan that is appropriate to the nature of the claim and the parties' needs.

Answer to Question 2

A motion for summary judgment is a motion that may be filed by either party and in which the party asks the court to enter judgment in his or her favor without a trial. A motion for summary judgment can be supported by evidence outside the pleadings, such as witnesses' affidavits, answers to interrogatories, and other evidence obtained prior to or during discovery. The attorney for the moving party also prepares and files with the court a memorandum of law in support of the motion.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

B

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
Both answers were spot on, thank you once again




 

Did you know?

Asthma cases in Americans are about 75% higher today than they were in 1980.

Did you know?

In 1885, the Lloyd Manufacturing Company of Albany, New York, promoted and sold "Cocaine Toothache Drops" at 15 cents per bottle! In 1914, the Harrison Narcotic Act brought the sale and distribution of this drug under federal control.

Did you know?

Chronic necrotizing aspergillosis has a slowly progressive process that, unlike invasive aspergillosis, does not spread to other organ systems or the blood vessels. It most often affects middle-aged and elderly individuals, spreading to surrounding tissue in the lungs. The disease often does not respond to conventionally successful treatments, and requires individualized therapies in order to keep it from becoming life-threatening.

Did you know?

Human neurons are so small that they require a microscope in order to be seen. However, some neurons can be up to 3 feet long, such as those that extend from the spinal cord to the toes.

Did you know?

Carbamazepine can interfere with the results of home pregnancy tests. If you are taking carbamazepine, do not try to test for pregnancy at home.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library