Author Question: Explain why good writing skills are important in the legal profession. Provide a list of the ... (Read 38 times)

cabate

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 537
Explain why good writing skills are important in the legal profession.
 
  Provide a list of
  the guidelines for a well-written document.

Question 2

List and describe the factors that should be considered before beginning a legal writing assignment.
 
  Help with this? Please.



Ptupou85

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

Law is a communications profession. For paralegals, good writing skills go hand-in- hand with successful job performance. Some of the paralegal's written work, such as correspondence, represents the firm for which the paralegal works. A well-written document is a positive reflection on the firm and upholds the firm's reputation for good work.

Organize and outline your presentation.
Choose the proper format for your document.
Use structural devices to guide the reader through complex discussions
Write to your audience.
Avoid legalese.
Be brief and to the point.
Use well-constructed sentences.
Use effective paragraphs and transitions.
Avoid pronoun confusion.
Be alert for sexist language.
Proofread and revise your document.

Answer to Question 2

Before undertaking a legal writing assignment, the factors that should be considered are:

The nature of the writing assignmentUnderstan ding the assignment allows the researcher to execute the task of legal research as efficiently as possible. The writing style, format, and methodological approach used in legal writing vary depending on the objectives of the document assigned. If a researcher has questions, they should be asked.
When the assignment must be completedUnderstand ing the due date for an assignment is critical. Frequently, legal documents must be filed with a court by a certain date or a client's rights may be lost or harmed. Also, clients usually want quick answers. A legal researcher needs to assess the situation realistically and make informed judgment calls by deciding what information is crucial and what may be omitted. If a researcher has questions, they should be directed to the supervising attorney.
What type of writing approach is appropriate to the assignmentOn receiving a writing assignment, a paralegal needs to determine what type of writing is requiredan objective analysis or an advocacy approach. An objective analysis discusses all sides of a legal matter. Advocacy involves presenting the facts and issues in a light most favorable to the client. The style of writing is different for these two approaches, so the approach needs to be determined at the outset in order to avoid spending time unnecessarily in preparing a document.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Patients who have undergone chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer often complain of a lack of mental focus; memory loss; and a general diminution in abilities such as multitasking, attention span, and general mental agility.

Did you know?

Only one in 10 cancer deaths is caused by the primary tumor. The vast majority of cancer mortality is caused by cells breaking away from the main tumor and metastasizing to other parts of the body, such as the brain, bones, or liver.

Did you know?

Eating carrots will improve your eyesight. Carrots are high in vitamin A (retinol), which is essential for good vision. It can also be found in milk, cheese, egg yolks, and liver.

Did you know?

Eating food that has been cooked with poppy seeds may cause you to fail a drug screening test, because the seeds contain enough opiate alkaloids to register as a positive.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library