This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: One advantage of correlated-groups designs over between-subjects designs is that they A) require ... (Read 60 times)

wrbasek0

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 560
One advantage of correlated-groups designs over between-subjects designs is that they
 
  A) require more participants.
  B) provide for better random assignment.
  C) are more sensitive to manipulation effects.
  D) need fewer variables.

Question 2

One important advantage of within-subjects designs is that they are often a great deal more sensitive than between-subjects designs to
 
  A) the effects of both the independent and dependent variables.
  B) statistical analysis.
  C) the effects of the independent variable.
  D) the effects of the dependent variable.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

olderstudent

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Answer to Question 1

Answer: C

Answer to Question 2

Answer: C




wrbasek0

  • Member
  • Posts: 560
Reply 2 on: Aug 4, 2018
Excellent


ASDFGJLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 335
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

About 100 new prescription or over-the-counter drugs come into the U.S. market every year.

Did you know?

Before a vaccine is licensed in the USA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews it for safety and effectiveness. The CDC then reviews all studies again, as well as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians. Every lot of vaccine is tested before administration to the public, and the FDA regularly inspects vaccine manufacturers' facilities.

Did you know?

According to the FDA, adverse drug events harmed or killed approximately 1,200,000 people in the United States in the year 2015.

Did you know?

Medication errors are three times higher among children and infants than with adults.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library