This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Correlational and differential research methods A) Are better than experiments at determining ... (Read 57 times)

Bob-Dole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 547
Correlational and differential research methods
 
  A) Are better than experiments at determining causality.
  B) Can be better than experiments at determining causality.
  C) Should never be used if it is technically possible to run an experiment.
  D) May be an ethical or practical alternative to experiments.

Question 2

The best way to test the hypothesized link between mercury poisoning and autism would be with
 
  A) An experiment.
  B) A differential research study because an experiment would be unethical.
  C) Either an experiment or a differential research study.
  D) A case study.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

jaygar71

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

Answer: D

Answer to Question 2

Answer: B




Bob-Dole

  • Member
  • Posts: 547
Reply 2 on: Aug 4, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


coreycathey

  • Member
  • Posts: 333
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

Certain rare plants containing cyanide include apricot pits and a type of potato called cassava. Fortunately, only chronic or massive ingestion of any of these plants can lead to serious poisoning.

Did you know?

Drug-induced pharmacodynamic effects manifested in older adults include drug-induced renal toxicity, which can be a major factor when these adults are experiencing other kidney problems.

Did you know?

More than 34,000 trademarked medication names and more than 10,000 generic medication names are in use in the United States.

Did you know?

Oliver Wendell Holmes is credited with introducing the words "anesthesia" and "anesthetic" into the English language in 1846.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library