This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: William Howard Taft was a a. corrupt, incompetent professional politician. b. strong ... (Read 103 times)

RRMR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
William Howard Taft was a
 
  a. corrupt, incompetent professional politician.
  b. strong preservationist in regard to the national forests.
  c. cautious and conservative leader.
  d. dynamic, aggressive personality who loved public confrontations.
  e. Democrat.

Question 2

By 1750, tobacco and rice planters had many contacts with each other and thought of themselves as southerners.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

jordangronback

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

False




RRMR

  • Member
  • Posts: 557
Reply 2 on: Aug 8, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


Joy Chen

  • Member
  • Posts: 354
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

Patients who have undergone chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer often complain of a lack of mental focus; memory loss; and a general diminution in abilities such as multitasking, attention span, and general mental agility.

Did you know?

Children of people with alcoholism are more inclined to drink alcohol or use hard drugs. In fact, they are 400 times more likely to use hard drugs than those who do not have a family history of alcohol addiction.

Did you know?

Elderly adults are at greatest risk of stroke and myocardial infarction and have the most to gain from prophylaxis. Patients ages 60 to 80 years with blood pressures above 160/90 mm Hg should benefit from antihypertensive treatment.

Did you know?

Women are 50% to 75% more likely than men to experience an adverse drug reaction.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library