Author Question: In hindsight, does Roosevelt's decision to hide his personal disability undermine his credibility as ... (Read 56 times)

lidoalex · **on:** Aug 11, 2018

In hindsight, does Roosevelt's decision to hide his personal disability undermine his credibility as a champion of polio victims?

What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

At the time of its creation, what made the March of Dimes unique among medical research charities?

What will be an ideal response?

mmj22343 · **Reply #1 on:** Aug 11, 2018

Answer to Question 1

In today's environment, some may criticize FDR for withholding the truth about
his disabilities. Some might even interpret his actions as his personal shame
regarding his condition. However, it is important to interpret Roosevelt's actions
in the context of the times in which he lived. There was a stigma attached to
people with disabilities one that could have denied him the presidency. If he
hadn't become president, it could be argued that he would not have been in the
position to do as much good for polio research as he did. There is, of course, the
larger question of the U.S. voters' right to know the strengths and limitations of
the people they elect.

Answer to Question 2

Although the practice is fairly common today, the March of Dimes was the first
truly grassroots fund-raising campaign to support medical services and research.
Up until that time, that kind of charitable donation had been limited to wealthy
donors with deep pockets. The March of Dimes empowered the people of the
nation to take action this at a time when they had reasons to feel powerless.