What U.S. Supreme Court case made the Miranda warning applicable ...

[Collmarie]

What U.S. Supreme Court case made the Miranda warning applicable to juveniles taken into custody?
 
  a. People v. Lara
  b. in re Gault
  c. Miranda v. Arizona
  d. Breed v. Jones

Question 2

Define, discuss, compare, and contrast deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

[kaylee05]

Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

Deterrence theorists assume that the fear of punishment keeps individuals from engaging in crime. Crimes may also be prevented when offenders are incapacitated. Punishments that incapacitate physically eliminate or reduce an offender's ability to commit crime. It may also be possible to reduce crime via rehabilitative programming. Rehabilitative efforts aim to restore an offender to a constructive (i.e., law abiding) place in society through education, vocational, or therapeutic treatment. Unlike deterrence, incapacitation, or rehabilitation, crime prevention is not the focus of retribution. Instead, retribution merely requires that offenders be punished in a manner proportionate to the harm they have inflicted.

[Collmarie]

TYSM

[lindahyatt42]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it