This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), SCOTUS held that police officers violated Ernesto Miranda's Fifth ... (Read 144 times)

123654777

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 585
In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), SCOTUS held that police officers violated Ernesto Miranda's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during Miranda's custodial interrogation.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

According to SCOTUS's decision in Miranda v. Arizona, the waiver of Miranda rights may be presumed, either by silence following warnings or from an eventual confession.
 
  a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

joshraies

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 351
Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

FALSE





 

Did you know?

Approximately one in three babies in the United States is now delivered by cesarean section. The number of cesarean sections in the United States has risen 46% since 1996.

Did you know?

In the United States, an estimated 50 million unnecessary antibiotics are prescribed for viral respiratory infections.

Did you know?

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness. As of yet, there is no cure. Everyone is at risk, and there may be no warning signs. It is six to eight times more common in African Americans than in whites. The best and most effective way to detect glaucoma is to receive a dilated eye examination.

Did you know?

Though “Krazy Glue” or “Super Glue” has the ability to seal small wounds, it is not recommended for this purpose since it contains many substances that should not enter the body through the skin, and may be harmful.

Did you know?

Blood in the urine can be a sign of a kidney stone, glomerulonephritis, or other kidney problems.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library