According to the Court of Appeals decision in United States v. ...

[nelaaney]

According to the Court of Appeals decision in United States v. Rodney:
 
  a. consent to search a person includes consent to frisk the groin area.
 b. consent to search a person does not include consent to frisk the groin area.
 c. consent to search a person includes consent to frisk the groin area only if police specifically ask for such.
  d. consent to search a person includes consent to frisk the groin area only for federal law enforcement.

Question 2

Which is true about containers?
 
  a. They can only be searched with probable cause and a warrant.
 b. No warrant is ever needed to search them, if there is probable cause to do so.
 c. No warrant is needed if the container is found in a car the police have probable cause to search, and the container is a likely place to find items that police are searching for.
  d. No warrant is needed if the container is found in a vehicle the police have probable cause to search, regardless of the nature of the container.

[bitingbit]

Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

c

[nelaaney]

Both answers were spot on, thank you once again

[bitingbit]

Great! Please up vote