In Illinois v. Lidster (2004), SCOTUS held that: a. a DUI ...

[scienceeasy]

In Illinois v. Lidster (2004), SCOTUS held that:
 
  a. a DUI checkpoint was constitutional.
  b. a drug interdiction information checkpoint was constitutional.
   c. a sexual assault information checkpoint was constitutional.
   d. a hit-and-run information checkpoint was constitutional.

Question 2

The balancing approach to reasonableness:
 
  a. requires courts to weigh the degree of intrusion against the government's need for the intrusion.
  b. prohibits the police from making intrusions simply to prevent crimes that may happen.
  c. does not require the court to weigh the degree of intrusion, as long as there is a factual foundation for the intrusion.
   d. does not require a factual foundation to support stops involving serious crimes.

[wtf444]

Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

a

[scienceeasy]

Both answers were spot on, thank you once again

[wtf444]

Great! Please up vote