Author Question: Arizona v. Johnson (2009) ruled that: a. it's lawful to frisk a passenger in a lawfully stopped ... (Read 168 times)

Marty · **on:** Aug 13, 2018

Arizona v. Johnson (2009) ruled that:

a. it's lawful to frisk a passenger in a lawfully stopped vehicle, even if the passenger wasn't suspected of committing a crime.
b. it's not lawful to frisk a passenger in a lawfully stopped vehicle, even if the passenger wasn't suspected of committing a crime.
c. highway sobriety checkpoint programs are reasonable stops of citizens, even when there's no individualized suspicion.
d. highway sobriety checkpoint programs are reasonable stops of citizens, only if there's individualized suspicion.

Question 2

There are two parts to the Fourth Amendment: the reasonableness clause and the:

a. warrant clause.
b. objective clause.
c. subjective clause.
d. suspicion clause.