This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: When you have a population that does not allow for probability sampling, one way of stating your ... (Read 32 times)

OSWALD

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 580
When you have a population that does not allow for probability sampling, one way of stating your findings that is what?
 
  a. say that your findings are statistically significant
  b. say that your findings are significant but not random
  c. say that your findings represent a statistically discernible difference
  d. say that your findings are as significant as if you have been able to use randomization

Question 2

The authors of your text caution when using reports of significance tests that the researcher should be aware of which of the following?
 
  a. that these do not represent tests of substantive significance
  b. that significance tests always show the relationship between the variables of interest
  c. that there is no relationship between the size of the sample and the results of the significance tests
  d. all of the above



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

kristenb95

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

a





 

Did you know?

Persons who overdose with cardiac glycosides have a better chance of overall survival if they can survive the first 24 hours after the overdose.

Did you know?

You should not take more than 1,000 mg of vitamin E per day. Doses above this amount increase the risk of bleeding problems that can lead to a stroke.

Did you know?

In Eastern Europe and Russia, interferon is administered intranasally in varied doses for the common cold and influenza. It is claimed that this treatment can lower the risk of infection by as much as 60–70%.

Did you know?

Ether was used widely for surgeries but became less popular because of its flammability and its tendency to cause vomiting. In England, it was quickly replaced by chloroform, but this agent caused many deaths and lost popularity.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library