In United States v. Arvizu, the Court held that a reasonable ...

[cherise1989]

In United States v. Arvizu, the Court held that a reasonable suspicion determination in automobile stop cases is based on:
 
  a. the totality of the circumstances.
  b. probable cause.
  c. each act viewed separately.
  d. None of the answers are correct.

Question 2

Which of the following is a basic rule governing vehicle stops by law enforcement officers?
 
  a. Roadblocks are an exception to the reasonable suspicion rule
  b. Traffic stops that are only pretexts for vehicle searches are valid
  c. Arresting occupants for non-jailable offenses is valid
  d. All of the answers are correct.

[popopong]

Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

d

[cherise1989]

Excellent

[duy1981999]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it