Perry v. New Hampshire (2012) ruled that: a. the due process ...

[c0205847]

Perry v. New Hampshire (2012) ruled that:
 
  a. the due process clause does not require a hearing into the reliability of eyewitness identification proceduresthat were not arranged by the police.
 b. accidental showups constitute fruit of the poisonous tree and cannot be used at trial.
  c. accidental show-ups are preferably to organized line-ups.
  d. accidental show-ups are a highly successful tool of law enforcement.

Question 2

Best guesses indicate that eyewitness misidentifications account for ______ percent of wrongful convictions of persons eventually exonerated by DNA.
 
  a. 10
  b. 25
  c. 75
  d. 90

[SomethingSomething]

Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

c

[c0205847]

TY

[SomethingSomething]

You're welcome