The court considered all of the following in Board of Education v ...

[chads108]

The court considered all of the following in Board of Education v Earls (2002) except:
 
  a. the ramifications of a failed UA on the student (for example, legal sanctions, academic discipline).
  b. the type of extra-curricular activity the tested students wanted to engage in.
  c. the nature of the school's/government's concerns and the effectiveness of the drug testing policy inaddressing those concerns.
 d. the character of the intrusion on privacy imposed by the testing policy.

Question 2

The special need used to justify employee drug testing is directed mainly at:
 
  a. employees who may endanger public safety while under the influence of illegal drugs.
  b. employees who may be smuggling and/or selling illegal drugs while employed.
  c. preventative government civil liability.
  d. criminal law enforcement in general.

[ambernicolefink]

Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

a

[chads108]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

[Jossy]

YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review