In the case of Wilson v Arkansas (1995), what did the court decide?
a. The police can never enter a home to execute a warrant without knocking first.
b. Searches of automobiles did not require probable cause because of the mobility factor.
c. Officers can only pat someone down, and the pat-down can only be for weapons.
d. The issue of allowing police to enter without knocking was reasonable but the state courts were remandedto determine reasonableness for the use of a no-knock entry.
Question 2
The major issue of contention between the Supreme Court majority opinion and the dissenting opinion in Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, the case involving the consent search of the defendant's car, was:
a. whether consent to search was actually obtained by the officers.
b. whether the initial stop of the defendant's car was lawful.
c. the coercion of the defendant to obtain the consent.
d. whether the police must inform a suspect of her right to refuse consent to a consent search.
Tubal ligation. To minimize the size of the incisions necessary, laparoscopic surgery may be used to
Functional MRI Scans These scans of human brains show localized average increases in neural activity
Mollie Wilson, Kwakwaka'wakw pictograph recording a 1927 potlatch showing coppers and cows, ...
A typical calibration code sticker on the case of a controller. The information on the sticker is ...
5-4 The relationship between vapor pressure and temperature—in this case for water. As the ...
The family described in Example Case 5