The landmark Supreme Court case of Tennessee v. Garner (1985) involved the authority of police to use deadly force to stop fleeing felons. In this case, the Supreme Court held that:
a. deadly force could be used only if the officer using deadly force had probable cause to believe the fleeingfelon posed a physical danger to himself or others.
b. the Constitution does not address such a situation.
c. deadly force could be used only if the officer using it had reasonable suspicion that the fleeing felon posed aphysical danger to himself or others.
d. deadly force could be used by the officer only if there was no other means reasonably available to stop thefleeing felon.
Question 2
According to the Supreme Court opinion in Tennessee v. Garner, involving the use of deadly force to apprehend a fleeing burglary suspect, deadly force:
a. is not a Fourth Amendment seizure.
b. to prevent the escape of all felony suspects is constitutionally reasonable.
c. is a Fourth Amendment seizure
d. can never be used for a property crime.
Action of Satiety Signals on Hypothalamic Neurons Involved in Control of Hunger and Satiety
When the United States gets stuck over a controversial issue—usually something a divided Congress ca
The processes involved in urine formation.
A typical output driver. In this case, the PCM applies voltage to the fuel pump relay coil to ...
Cross section of the wrist showing tendons and nerves involved in carpal tunnel syndrome.
The rates of police reported sexual offences