The Supreme Court has ruled that a state statute which permits ...

[future617RT]

The Supreme Court has ruled that a state statute which permits police to require a suspect disclose his identity during a Terry stop or face prosecution for failing to answer is:
 
  a. unconstitutional because people are not obliged to respond to an officer's questions.
  b. unconstitutional because it violates the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
  c. constitutional because it is rationally related to the purpose and practical demands of a Terry stop.
  d. constitutional only if the state supreme court has ruled that it is.

Question 2

Which of the following does not implicate the Fourth Amendment?
 
  a. show of force with submission
  b. frisk
  c. briefly grabbing a suspect to check suspicion
  d. asking questions of potential witnesses at the scene of a robbery

[bitingbit]

Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

d

[future617RT]

Wow, this really help

[miss_1456@hotmail.com]

TYSM