Justice Black, in his dissenting opinion in Katz v. U.S., claimed ...

[Davideckstein7]

Justice Black, in his dissenting opinion in Katz v. U.S., claimed that:
 
  a. the Fourth Amendment's words did not support the majority and that the Court was expanding the meaningof the Fourth Amendment to keep up with the times.
 b. the Fourth Amendment created a general right of privacy.
  c. the Fourth Amendment was meant to protect against eavesdropping.
  d. the Fourth Amendment created a general right of privacy and was meant to protect against eavesdropping.

Question 2

In which case did the court rule that a person's right to privacy outweighed their location? That is, the person's expectation of privacy as opposed to the place that would have an expectation of privacy?
 
  a. Tennessee v Garner
  b. Mapp v Ohio
  c. Katz v U.S.
  d. Miranda v Arizona

[krakiolit]

Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

c