This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In which Supreme Court case did the court determine that inmate privacy was NOT a valid reason to ... (Read 114 times)

deesands

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
In which Supreme Court case did the court determine that inmate privacy was NOT a valid reason to refuse hiring women as correctional officers?
 
  A) Morrissey v. Brewer
  B) Mempa v. Rhay
  C) Dothard v. Rawlinson
  D) Gunther v. Iowa

Question 2

Which of the following is an organizational source of stress in prisons?
 
  A) threat of violence
  B) supervisor demands
  C) problems with co-workers
  D) inmate demands and manipulations



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Anna

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Answer to Question 1

Answer: D

Answer to Question 2

Answer: B



deesands

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
Both answers were spot on, thank you once again



Anna

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343

 

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

The newest statin drug, rosuvastatin, has been called a superstatin because it appears to reduce LDL cholesterol to a greater degree than the other approved statin drugs.

Did you know?

As the western states of America were settled, pioneers often had to drink rancid water from ponds and other sources. This often resulted in chronic diarrhea, causing many cases of dehydration and death that could have been avoided if clean water had been available.

Did you know?

All patients with hyperparathyroidism will develop osteoporosis. The parathyroid glands maintain blood calcium within the normal range. All patients with this disease will continue to lose calcium from their bones every day, and there is no way to prevent the development of osteoporosis as a result.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library