Author Question: In which case did the Court first reason that preponderance of evidence is NOT a sufficient basis ... (Read 161 times)

pragya sharda

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 566
In which case did the Court first reason that preponderance of evidence is NOT a sufficient basis for a decision when youths are charged with acts that would be criminal if committed by adults?
 
  A) Kent v. United States B) McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
  C) In re Gault D) In re Winship

Question 2

The Bloods and the Crips, the most notorious Los Angeles gangs, are representative of the horizontal/commission type.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



brbarasa

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

TRUE



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Multiple experimental evidences have confirmed that at the molecular level, cancer is caused by lesions in cellular DNA.

Did you know?

The average adult has about 21 square feet of skin.

Did you know?

Drying your hands with a paper towel will reduce the bacterial count on your hands by 45–60%.

Did you know?

The familiar sounds of your heart are made by the heart's valves as they open and close.

Did you know?

No drugs are available to relieve parathyroid disease. Parathyroid disease is caused by a parathyroid tumor, and it needs to be removed by surgery.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library