Match the case with the correct ruling with regard to a stop. ...

[anjilletteb]

Match the case with the correct ruling with regard to a stop.
 
  Column 1:
  United States v. Mendenhall
  California v. Hodari D.
  Florida v. Bostick
  United States v. Montoya De Hernandez
  Michigan v. Chestnut
 
  Column 2:
  ruled that a person has been seized when a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave
  ruled the seizure of a person during a pursuit occurs only when there is an application of force by the police or the suspect submits to police authority
  what constitute a restraint on liberty prompting a person to conclude that he is not free to leave will vary, not only with the particular police conduct at issue, but also with the setting in which the conduct occurs
  The 16 hour detention of a traveler at the border was permissible
  ruled that in order to determine whether a particular encounter constitutes a seizure, a court must consider all the circumstances surrounding the encounter to determine whether the police conduct would have communicated to a reasonable person that the person was not free to decline the officers requests or otherwise terminate the encounter

Question 2

Decide if the description is required for an arrest warrant or if an arrest warrant is not required.
 
  Column 1:
  In a home/residence absent exigent circumstances
  In a third-party home
  The arrest is made in public
 
  Column 2:
  the description is required for an arrest warrant
  an arrest warrant is not required
  the description is required for an arrest warrant

[wshriver]

Answer to Question 1

Column 1: United States v. Mendenhall
Column 2: ruled that a person has been seized when a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave

Column 1: California v. Hodari D.
Column 2: ruled the seizure of a person during a pursuit occurs only when there is an application of force by the police or the suspect submits to police authority

Column 1: Florida v. Bostick
Column 2: ruled that in order to determine whether a particular encounter constitutes a seizure, a court must consider all the
circumstances surrounding the
encounter to determine whether the police conduct would have communicated to a reasonable person that the person was not free to decline the officers requests or otherwise terminate the encounter

Column 1: United States v. Montoya De Hernandez
Column 2: The 16 hour detention of a traveler at the border was permissible

Column 1: United States v. Montoya De
Hernandez
Column 2: The 16 hour detention of a traveler at the border was permissible

Answer to Question 2

Column 1: In a home/residence absent exigent circumstances
Column 2: the description is required for an arrest warrant

Column 1: In a third-party home
Column 2: the description is required for an arrest warrant

Column 1: The arrest is made in public
Column 2: an arrest warrant is not required

[anjilletteb]

Thanks

[wshriver]

Welcome