Author Question: Distinguish between a bright-line decision and case-by-case adjudication. What will be an ideal ... (Read 42 times)

jrubin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Distinguish between a bright-line decision and case-by-case adjudication.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Were Gonzalez-Lauzan's statements made after Miranda warnings were read admissible?
 
  Officers took Gonzalez-Lauzan, who was serving a ten-month sentence for violating supervised release on a previous conviction to a federal court house to question him abut his involvement in a murder. The officers agreed among themselves in advance not to administer Miranda warnings, and instructed Gonzalez-Lauzan several times just to listen and told him that they did not have any questions. The officers hoped that the strength of this evidence would persuade Gonzalez-Lauzan to talk about his participation in the killing. Approximately two-and-a-half hours into the meeting, Gonzalez-Lauzan stated suddenly, okay, you got me. He was then immediately read his Miranda rights, signed a waiver form, and subsequently made multiple incriminating statements during the interrogation.
  What will be an ideal response?



xiaomengxian

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
Answer to Question 1

A bright-line decision is one in which the Court hands down a specific rule that is meant to be applied uniformly in every case, with very little interpretation. It is like the metaphorical line drawn in the sand in which the Court emphatically communicates to the criminal justice community what it can and cannot do.
A decision requiring case-by-case adjudication is quite different. In these types of rulings, the Supreme Court often refers to the concept of totality of circumstances. This means that all the facts and circumstances surrounding the case must be examined in order to determine whether a constitutional rights violation has taken place. Deciding whether the totality of circumstances supports the action in question requires looking at each case individually.

Answer to Question 2

Yes



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Though methadone is often used to treat dependency on other opioids, the drug itself can be abused. Crushing or snorting methadone can achieve the opiate "rush" desired by addicts. Improper use such as these can lead to a dangerous dependency on methadone. This drug now accounts for nearly one-third of opioid-related deaths.

Did you know?

The longest a person has survived after a heart transplant is 24 years.

Did you know?

When intravenous medications are involved in adverse drug events, their harmful effects may occur more rapidly, and be more severe than errors with oral medications. This is due to the direct administration into the bloodstream.

Did you know?

More than 34,000 trademarked medication names and more than 10,000 generic medication names are in use in the United States.

Did you know?

Though newer “smart” infusion pumps are increasingly becoming more sophisticated, they cannot prevent all programming and administration errors. Health care professionals that use smart infusion pumps must still practice the rights of medication administration and have other professionals double-check all high-risk infusions.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library