Did the trial court err by taking a partial verdict on the ten ...

[asd123]

Did the trial court err by taking a partial verdict on the ten counts on which guilty verdicts were returned?
 
  Under Maryland law a defendant is entitled to a unanimous verdict. A jury of 12 in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City was deliberating on a case with three co-defendants, charged with numerous counts of homicide, assault, and other crimes in September 2003. On the second day of deliberation, a Thursday, with Maryland under a state of emergency with Hurricane Isabel approaching, the court announced that the court would close at 1:00 p.m. and the city subways would close at 2:00 p.m. A juror who had indicated at voir dire that she had a prepaid vacation said she could not return on Monday. The defense attorneys refused to accept a verdict by an 11 member jury. The judge then had the jurors polled, and, over defense objections, took verdicts of conviction and acquittal on some counts and declared a mistrial as to the counts on which there was no verdict at that time.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

The new HHS guidelines did not:
 
  a. apply only to social science research
  b. apply only to HHS funded research
  c. exclude most field studies
   d. continue Institutional Review Boards

[Swizqar]

Answer to Question 1

Yes. Convictions reversed and case remanded.

Answer to Question 2

A

[asd123]

TYSM

[ttt030911]

YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review