Author Question: In Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts (2009), the Supreme Court ruled that a scientific report prepared ... (Read 114 times)

swpotter12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
In Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts (2009), the Supreme Court ruled that a scientific report prepared for the prosecution
 
  A. Must be given to the defendant under the Due Process Clause
  B. Is admissible only if a testable sample of the material on which the report is based is made available to the defendant
  C. Is admissible under the science report hearsay exception
  D. Is subject to cross-examination at trial

Question 2

If a P/P agency is based on a control model, success is measured by the delivery of or referral to services, including education, training, employment, counseling, and clientconsumer satisfaction with the level of service.
 
  a. True
  b. False



Harbringer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Answer to Question 1

ANSWER: D

Answer to Question 2

b



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

When Gabriel Fahrenheit invented the first mercury thermometer, he called "zero degrees" the lowest temperature he was able to attain with a mixture of ice and salt. For the upper point of his scale, he used 96°, which he measured as normal human body temperature (we know it to be 98.6° today because of more accurate thermometers).

Did you know?

IgA antibodies protect body surfaces exposed to outside foreign substances. IgG antibodies are found in all body fluids. IgM antibodies are the first type of antibody made in response to an infection. IgE antibody levels are often high in people with allergies. IgD antibodies are found in tissues lining the abdomen and chest.

Did you know?

There are more bacteria in your mouth than there are people in the world.

Did you know?

The lipid bilayer is made of phospholipids. They are arranged in a double layer because one of their ends is attracted to water while the other is repelled by water.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library