This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In the ExplorIt software, what statistic should you check to see if the differences you observe in a ... (Read 23 times)

Mimi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 542
In the ExplorIt software, what statistic should you check to see if the differences you observe in a table are statistically significant?
 
  a. the correlation coefficient
  b. Chi-Square
  c. the Probability
  d. all of the above

Question 2

When using tabular statistics, researchers control for variations in the size of different subgroups by
 
  a. only comparing columns with the same number of respondents.
  b. comparing percentages.
  c. calculating the probability statistic.
  d. randomly dropping the respondents from the larger subgroups.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Kimmy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 342
Answer to Question 1

C

Answer to Question 2

B





 

Did you know?

Eating food that has been cooked with poppy seeds may cause you to fail a drug screening test, because the seeds contain enough opiate alkaloids to register as a positive.

Did you know?

Oxytocin is recommended only for pregnancies that have a medical reason for inducing labor (such as eclampsia) and is not recommended for elective procedures or for making the birthing process more convenient.

Did you know?

Autoimmune diseases occur when the immune system destroys its own healthy tissues. When this occurs, white blood cells cannot distinguish between pathogens and normal cells.

Did you know?

The familiar sounds of your heart are made by the heart's valves as they open and close.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library