This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Should statements including hearsay within hearsay be admissible in court? Can these statements ... (Read 65 times)

swpotter12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Should statements including hearsay within hearsay be admissible in court? Can these statements truly be reliable? Why or why not?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

A double helix refers to a complete DNA molecule.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

verrinzo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Answer to Question 1

Hearsay within hearsay is a hearsay statement that includes one or more additional hearsay statements. These statements are admissible in court only when all of the statements conform to the requirements of the hearsay exceptions in the Federal Rules of Evidence. Reliability depends on the analysis of the questioned statement. Opinions will vary.

Answer to Question 2

TRUE




swpotter12

  • Member
  • Posts: 527
Reply 2 on: Aug 24, 2018
:D TYSM


TheDev123

  • Member
  • Posts: 332
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

Serum cholesterol testing in adults is recommended every 1 to 5 years. People with diabetes and a family history of high cholesterol should be tested even more frequently.

Did you know?

Your heart beats over 36 million times a year.

Did you know?

About 100 new prescription or over-the-counter drugs come into the U.S. market every year.

Did you know?

Cancer has been around as long as humankind, but only in the second half of the twentieth century did the number of cancer cases explode.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library