This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which method of compelling information disclosure is better, a subpoena for documents, or a search ... (Read 44 times)

bb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 544
Which method of compelling information disclosure is better, a subpoena for documents, or a search warrant? Why is it better?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

What is a confirmed email and how is it utilized by investigators?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

cici

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 325
Answer to Question 1

Section 2703 of ECPA provides investigators with five mechanisms for compelling an Internet Service Provider to disclose information that might be useful in an investigation of a hacker. A search warrant is preferable to a simple subpoena. Subpoenas aren't good enough for obtaining unopened emails as listed in paragraph number two. Further, under paragraph five, the ECPA does not require notification to the subscriber when using a search warrant. While both procedures can request non disclosure, or at least a delay of disclosure to the defendant, a search warrant has more power.

Answer to Question 2

There are websites that can be used to send traceable emails. This works kind of like sending a registered letter via the postal service in that the sender will receive confirmation that the message was received. One example of such a service is confirm.to. For a modest fee, this website attaches a line of code to your email and then sends it on to the intended recipient. As soon as that person clicks on your email message, a message is automatically sent by confirm.to telling you the IP address, date, and time the email was opened.




bb

  • Member
  • Posts: 544
Reply 2 on: Aug 24, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


bulacsom

  • Member
  • Posts: 329
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

The human body's pharmacokinetics are quite varied. Our hair holds onto drugs longer than our urine, blood, or saliva. For example, alcohol can be detected in the hair for up to 90 days after it was consumed. The same is true for marijuana, cocaine, ecstasy, heroin, methamphetamine, and nicotine.

Did you know?

The FDA recognizes 118 routes of administration.

Did you know?

Patients who cannot swallow may receive nutrition via a parenteral route—usually, a catheter is inserted through the chest into a large vein going into the heart.

Did you know?

In 1835 it was discovered that a disease of silkworms known as muscardine could be transferred from one silkworm to another, and was caused by a fungus.

Did you know?

Though Candida and Aspergillus species are the most common fungal pathogens causing invasive fungal disease in the immunocompromised, infections due to previously uncommon hyaline and dematiaceous filamentous fungi are occurring more often today. Rare fungal infections, once accurately diagnosed, may require surgical debridement, immunotherapy, and newer antifungals used singly or in combination with older antifungals, on a case-by-case basis.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library