Author Question: The Supreme Court offered conflicting rationales in support of its due process decisions declaring ... (Read 48 times)

EY67 · **on:** Aug 24, 2018

The Supreme Court offered conflicting rationales in support of its due process decisions declaring state confessions to be involuntary.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

In what ways do actions based on administrative justification get around the requirements of the Fourth Amendment?

What will be an ideal response?

elizabethrperez · **Reply #1 on:** Aug 24, 2018

Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

Actions based on administrative justification and consent require neither reasonable suspicion nor probable cause. The term administrative justification is something of a euphemism. It is not really justification at all. Actions based on administrative justification require that the government's interest in protecting public safety outweighs individual privacy interests. Consent searches, in contrast, need to be predicated on little more than validly given consent. Actions based on administrative justification are rich in variety.