This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The controversial practice of extraordinary rendition has been approved by the United States Supreme ... (Read 14 times)

eruditmonkey@yahoo.com

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
The controversial practice of extraordinary rendition has been approved by the United States Supreme Court.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Citing cases, what are the restrictions on discovery by the defense?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

dreamfighter72

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 355
Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

Although the Fifth Amendment protects the defendant from disclosing certain incriminating information, he or she may be required to disclose information regarding the defenses he or she intends to use at trial, such as alibis. In Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970), the Court considered Florida's notice of alibi statute, which required the defendant, at the prosecution's request, to disclose alibi defenses coupled with a list of witnesses who would support them. The Court found that this type of discovery does not violate the Fifth Amendment because it is not self-incriminating. In fact, the purpose of an alibi defense is to exculpate (clear) the defendant. According to the Court, Nothing in the Fifth Amendment privilege entitles a defendant as a matter of constitutional right to await the end of the State's case before announcing the nature of his defense, any more than it entitles him to await the jury's verdict on the State's case-in-chief before deciding whether or not to take the stand himself.

In United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225 (1975), the defense attempted to call a private investigator to the stand whose testimony would have cast doubt on the prosecution's case.
The trial judge ruled that the investigator could not testify until the prosecution received portions of the investigator's pretrial investigative report. The Supreme Court upheld this decision. The defense argued that this decision infringed on the accused's right to compulsory process to call the investigator to the stand.




eruditmonkey@yahoo.com

  • Member
  • Posts: 546
Reply 2 on: Aug 24, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


elyse44

  • Member
  • Posts: 319
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

Less than one of every three adults with high LDL cholesterol has the condition under control. Only 48.1% with the condition are being treated for it.

Did you know?

The use of salicylates dates back 2,500 years to Hippocrates's recommendation of willow bark (from which a salicylate is derived) as an aid to the pains of childbirth. However, overdosage of salicylates can harm body fluids, electrolytes, the CNS, the GI tract, the ears, the lungs, the blood, the liver, and the kidneys and cause coma or death.

Did you know?

Chronic necrotizing aspergillosis has a slowly progressive process that, unlike invasive aspergillosis, does not spread to other organ systems or the blood vessels. It most often affects middle-aged and elderly individuals, spreading to surrounding tissue in the lungs. The disease often does not respond to conventionally successful treatments, and requires individualized therapies in order to keep it from becoming life-threatening.

Did you know?

Blood is approximately twice as thick as water because of the cells and other components found in it.

Did you know?

Stroke kills people from all ethnic backgrounds, but the people at highest risk for fatal strokes are: black men, black women, Asian men, white men, and white women.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library