Explain the Supreme Court's view on identifications that result ...

[stevenposner]

Explain the Supreme Court's view on identifications that result from illegal searches or seizures.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

A person is arrested for speeding. The officer orders the driver out of the car, pats down his outer clothing, feels no weapons but does feel what seems like a rock of cocaine. A search of the driver's pocket is unconstitutional.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

[sultansheikh]

Answer to Question 1

In Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721 (1969), the fingerprint identification of a rape suspect was deemed inadmissible because it was the product of an illegal arrest. However, in a similar case, United States v. Crews, 445 U.S. 463 (1980), the Supreme Court decided otherwise. Crews was illegally arrested and photographed and then his photograph was shown to a witness, who identified him as the perpetrator.

Answer to Question 2

FALSE United States v. Robinson (1973 )

[stevenposner]

Thank you!

[sultansheikh]

Always glad to help...