This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The effect of Silverthorne Lumber Co v. U. S. (1920 ) is that a police officer is not allowed to ... (Read 40 times)

Engineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
The effect of Silverthorne Lumber Co v. U. S. (1920 ) is that a police officer is not allowed to testify about the existence of incriminating evidence that was illegally seized.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Explain the term exceptions as applied to the Fourth Amendment.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

patma1981

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 292
Answer to Question 1

TRUE
COMMENT: this answer requires some inferring, and does not include the qualifier about the
derivative evidence rule; you can insert a qualifier (as a general rule)

Answer to Question 2

The four types of warrantless searches are (1) searches incident to an arrest; (2) searches conducted under exigent circumstances; (3) searches involving automobiles; and (4) searches based on the plain view doctrine.





 

Did you know?

More than 150,000 Americans killed by cardiovascular disease are younger than the age of 65 years.

Did you know?

All adults should have their cholesterol levels checked once every 5 years. During 2009–2010, 69.4% of Americans age 20 and older reported having their cholesterol checked within the last five years.

Did you know?

Eating food that has been cooked with poppy seeds may cause you to fail a drug screening test, because the seeds contain enough opiate alkaloids to register as a positive.

Did you know?

In 1864, the first barbiturate (barbituric acid) was synthesized.

Did you know?

Human kidneys will clean about 1 million gallons of blood in an average lifetime.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library